• Village Gamer

  • Reaction To The CRTC Rejection Of Bell – Astral Transaction

19th October 2012

Reaction To The CRTC Rejection Of Bell – Astral Transaction

Bell CanadaBCE Inc. (Bell) announced last evening that the corporation will request that the federal Cabinet intervene in the CRTC‘s decision to reject Bell’s acquisition of Astral Media. Bell is appalled that the CRTC would come to a decision that so negatively impacts Canadian consumers and the national broadcast industry, contravenes its own policy and is tainted by behind-the-scenes lobbying by Bell’s cable rivals.

“This is a decision that should not stand. Canadian consumers were told today by the CRTC that they don’t deserve more – more choice, more competition, more Canadian content funding – all of which Bell and Astral committed to with this transaction,” said George Cope, President and CEO of Bell Canada and BCE Inc. “We met all the CRTC’s rules, indeed our acquisition of Astral was based directly on the CRTC’s currently in-place Diversity of Voices policy. The wide-ranging benefits to Canadians of the transaction are clear, but the CRTC has told consumers that they and the rules in place just don’t matter.”

In its 2008 Diversity of Voices regulatory policy, the CRTC confirmed that it would approve broadcasting transactions resulting in a company controlling less than 35% of total TV audience share. Bell and Astral combined would have an English-language TV market share of 33.5% and just 24.4% of the French-language TV market, both well within the rules (it is worth noting that this would put Bell-Astral on par with cable company Shaw/Corus, which has a 30.2% share of English-language TV, and well behind cable company Quebecor’s existing 30% share of French-language TV).

With this CRTC policy in place, and which Bell logically used as its guide in acquiring Astral, the CRTC instead quotes a working paper from 1978, a single application from 1986 and a 1989 public notice to justify its rejection of the Bell-Astral transaction in 2012.

“The CRTC’s decision reflects a bygone era, based on antiquated working papers from the 1970s and 1980s that have little bearing on modern Canadian broadcasting, and completely ignores its own most recent policy. Canadian broadcasting needs significant new investment, fresh ideas and increased choice in a time of cable company dominance in media and accelerating competition from foreign giants who invest little to nothing in the Canadian broadcasting system,” said Mirko Bibic, Bell’s Chief Legal and Regulatory Officer. “Considering the dire impact the CRTC’s decision will have on consumers in communities small and large, the blow it delivers to confidence in Canada’s regulatory system, and the fact that the CRTC worked so closely with cable companies to arrive at its conclusions, Bell is compelled to launch its request to the federal Cabinet to direct the CRTC to actually follow its own in-place policy.”

Bell has confirmed that senior CRTC officials met privately with Bell’s cable competitors multiple times in the days and weeks before the commission began its public hearings into the Bell-Astral transaction, while denying Bell the opportunity for any such consultations – calling into question the impartiality of the entire process.

“That the CRTC was not guided by its own rules is a grave concern. In fact, this is just the latest in a series of decisions where the commission held hearings, established rules… and then inexplicably ignored them when Bell moved forward with a strategic investment. This sends a strong message that Canadian broadcasting regulation is impetuous and unreliable, ” said Kevin Crull, President of Bell Media.

Bell’s acquisition of Astral was supported by independent producers, advertisers, media companies, community and arts groups – and by 99.84% of Astral shareholders. In rejecting the transaction, the CRTC sent a clear message to the broadcasting industry, investors and the corporate sector that its own rules don’t matter – to the detriment of consumers across Canada.

“A combined Bell-Astral would grow the entire Canadian broadcasting industry to the benefit of consumers and content creators. Instead, the CRTC has decided to favour the interests of unregulated U.S. broadcast channels and Internet television providers, while blatantly protecting the interests of cable companies, such as Québecor, which continues to dominate the French-language media market” said Mr. Crull.

Meanwhile, Phil Lind, Vice-Chairman of Rogers Communications issued the following statement on the CRTC decision, stating that “Rogers commends the CRTC for this courageous decision. We believe that Canadians should have fair and open access to content. This is a good day for consumers.”

If the CRTC’s decision is allowed to stand, the Astral-Bell transaction will not be allowed to close and the negative outcomes are clear:

  • It cuts off more than $240 million in new funding for Canadian content, including greatly expanded Canadian news and entertainment programming in both official languages.
  • French-language consumers have been robbed of a planned national French-language news service based in Québec; Québec consumers, content creators and its broadcasting industry remain at the mercy of Québecor, the integrated cable-broadcaster that has long dominated Québec media with a French-language TV market share of 30%, far higher than the combined Bell-Astral share of 24.4%.
  • Consumers across the country are denied a stronger homegrown voice able to compete with unregulated U.S. TV channels and Internet OTT broadcasters – including with Bell’s planned all-Canadian service featuring Astral’s Canadian and international movies and Bell Media news, sports and entertainment programming to compete with cross-border services like Netflix and Apple TV.
  • It forces a review of Bell’s commitment to continue to operate money-losing TV stations in small communities across Canada as part of the Bell-Astral investment plan.
  • Canadians in the North are denied significant new broadband communications infrastructure planned as part of the Bell-Astral benefits package.

Rather than welcome these clear benefits to consumers of the Bell-Astral plan to invest heavily in Canadian programming and broadcasting services, the CRTC chose instead to serve cable companies focused on protecting their profit margins, already the highest in North America. These same corporations dedicated their vast TV, print and other media holdings to an aggressive and blatantly misleading campaign aimed at subverting due process and quashing enhanced competition. In combination with private meetings with the cablecos, the CRTC fell head over heels for their carefully orchestrated and well-funded propaganda effort that made a mockery of the entire process.

If the CRTC’s decision stands, one of the closing conditions for Bell’s $3.38 billion acquisition of Astral Media will not be met and the transaction will not proceed. The transaction also remains subject to approval by the federal Competition Bureau.

Canada’s largest media union, The Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada says that “the CRTC’s well-reasoned decision to deny Bell’s application to acquire Astral addressed concerns of Canadians and Canadian consumers about the scope and impact of this transaction.”

The Commission said that “approving this transaction is not in the public interest.” It noted prevalent concern that “none of the $241.3 million in tangible benefits would be directed toward existing or new local programming for any of the local television and radio stations” that Bell would have bought. CEP highlighted these points when it appeared at the CRTC’s September public hearing.

“BCE failed to persuade us that the deal would benefit Canadians,” said Jean-Pierre Blais, Chairman of the CRTC. “It would have placed significant market power in the hands of one of the country’s largest media companies. We could not have ensured a robust Canadian broadcasting system without imposing extensive and intrusive safeguards, which would have been to the detriment of the entire industry.”

Among other things, Bell claims it could extract millions of dollars of “synergies” from buying Astral without explaining how it would achieve these savings.

“CEP set out its concern that these so-called synergies actually meant more job losses in a sector that has been hard hit in the last decade,” said Peter Murdoch CEP’s Vice-President, Media. “Bell proposed to devote millions of dollars to independant productions; CEP expects that as one of the country’s largest media companies, Bell will continue to invest in Canadian programming. Going forward, CEP expects the CRTC will apply the same rigour and analytical criteria it did in this decision to the next application filed regarding the Astral assets.”

This entry was posted on Friday, October 19th, 2012 at 7:48 am and is filed under Business News, Government, National News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  1. Tami Quiring (@VillageGamer)
    12:48 am on October 19th, 2012

    Reaction To The CRTC Rejection Of Bell – Astral Transaction http://t.co/su1N42R1

  2. Janal Bechthold (@JanalMusic)
    1:16 am on October 19th, 2012

    Hmmm not sure how I feel about this… @VillageGamer: Reaction To The CRTC Rejection Of Bell – Astral Transaction http://t.co/rinySLgr

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Archives

  • Subscribe to our Newsletter

  • Select a list:

  • GWEN Radio
  • Gamers Giving Back